Specifier support workflow
Outdoor lighting reviews depend on more than a fixture schedule. Our workflow organizes geometry, photometry, solar resource assumptions, controls interfaces and submittal evidence so project teams can identify unresolved decisions before procurement.
We record roadway width, pole setback, mounting height, target illuminance, uniformity criteria and operating hours. For solar work, the intake separates night profile, autonomy days and local irradiation assumptions. Missing survey information remains labeled rather than silently estimated.
Candidate IES or LDT distributions are reviewed against pole spacing and aiming. The comparison addresses luminous flux, candela distribution, BUG rating, correlated color temperature and glare exposure; highest lm/W is not treated as a substitute for useful delivered light.
Schedules can consolidate dimensional data, control interfaces, IP rating, surge protection and declared certification scope. Report numbers are supplied only when attached to the applicable product, market and configuration.
Confirm plan scale, mounting positions, required standard and energy source.
Remove optics or system sizes that conflict with geometry and duty cycle.
Check average, minimum, uniformity and boundary light using agreed assumptions.
Issue the selected file set with revision date and unresolved field checks.
A CAD or dimensioned PDF plan, target criteria, preferred pole locations and operating schedule provide a reproducible starting point. A local irradiance source and shading notes are required for autonomous solar sizing.
Attach the criteria you already have; we will identify missing inputs before calculation work begins.